Saturday, December 12, 2009

A car is never only a car

Autos, enthusiasts park for a weekend
at Pebble Beach's Concours d'Elegance




by Tod Mesirow


(ALL OF MESIROW'S PHOTOS MAY BE FOUND HERE.)

With apologies to Groucho Marx or Sigmund Freud: a car is never just a car.

(You probably forgot that Groucho’s show “You Bet Your Life” was sponsored by the Chrysler DeSoto for years.)

Regardless of where you live, every few days you run into someone who says “my car is only a means of transportation, I only use it to get from here to there.”

But even the most ardent cars-are-utilitarian types waiver in their lack of ardor upon sighting something as exotic as a modern supercar, or a 1930 Bugatti with elephant belly seats. It’s all but impossible even to feign disinterest when presented to an immaculate Alfa Romeo or a rare racing Porsche.


Zagato, front grille.

There’s no way not to have a love/hate relationship with the car, the penultimate creation of modern technology, the apotheosis of the wheel, the holy grail of independence. A car is really magic – it’s a time machine, a trance machine, an embodiment of freedom, of personality, an extension of our limited physical abilities. There’s nothing on earth not man-made that can outrun a car. In the old days when the iron horse ruled the landscape there were famous races between men on horseback and the steam and coal powered behemoths that traversed our massive continent. Eventually the horses lost. When cars came into existence around the turn of the last century, the racing resumed. These days there’s no contest. Unless your electric car runs down its battery.

But the car is also profligate in its use of resources – oil, steel, concrete, rubber – and elephant belly, if you own a 1930 Bugatti. An inordinate amount of the world’s economic production is tied up in one way or another in the creation, use, and maintenance of the automobile-based transportation system. Some studies claim greenhouse gas output of cars and trucks is challenged in the United States by methane from cows used in the beef production system, but cars and trucks spew significant amounts of pollutants – to wit this one, claiming that “transportation is the largest single source of air pollution in the United States.”

Which leads some people to triumphantly predict the end of oil, the turning off of the pumps at the gas station, and a transportation future powered by quiet clean electric vehicles sourcing their energy from the sun, the wind, and the earth – if they can ever figure out how to generate geothermal energy without causing earthquakes.

The day may come when cars run on something other than petroleum. But that day is way more than the normal “in ten years” time-frame that is attached to any promising futuristic technology. It’s always ten years away, no matter how many years go by. It’s that future that seems to get further away the closer we get to it.

Next to no one who attends the annual automotive version of a religious ritual really gives a rat’s ass about all of this – other than the elephant belly interior. Thousands and thousands journey from across the globe to attend the premiere car event of the year, complete with a dizzying array of auctions, awards, and people dressed up in period costumes. The former weekend has expanded to nearly a week, with new events being added and old ones expanding. They’re referred to as Pebble Beach, and the crowning event in most people’s minds is the Concours d’Elegance, held at the Pebble Beach Golf Links every August since 1950, cars “are invited to appear on the famed eighteenth fairway.”



a 1941 Thunderbolt

But that’s Sunday. My third time there, only the second consecutive year, started on Thursday, when I drove up from Los Angeles in my relatively new, though purchased used, 530xi BMW wagon. It’s about a six hour drive from LA to Monterey, depending on the normal things like the chosen route, the traffic, and one’s willingness to exceed the posted speed limits. Often there’s difficulty along the 101 through Santa Barbara, and the speed limit is 65. Another option is the 5 freeway, which takes the driver over the Grapevine, a massive, steep, pass through the Tehachapi Mountains and down into the Central Valley.

It’s completely dramatic, both visually, and from the driver’s standpoint. There’s a slow truck lane to the right; there are huge, long, if-your-brakes-fail ramps towards the bottom, that seem as if there’s no way they would stop a runaway 18-wheeler. But I’m sure they would, otherwise why build them? Just for peace of mind? It would be fun to see one tested. Evil Knievel, where are you when we need you? Maybe we can get the Mythbusters to try it.

After the descent into the valley the speed limit bumps up from 65 to 70; using the tacit add-ten-mph understanding that seems to function on major highways I set the cruise control for 80. There’s a bit of weaving in and out of trucks and slower cars that a pack of us undertake as the 4-lane divided highway stretches off beyond the edge of the flat horizon. At the 46 things change again – the preferred route - most direct, least amount of curves and grade changes – several of us in the pack peel off and head west. Now the limit drops down to 55, and the road is two lanes – one in each direction. Oil pumps line acres on either side, eventually giving way to orange groves, then almond groves. The challenge here is to take advantage of the passing zones, and zip around the trucks and other slow-moving vehicles, without having to play chicken with on-coming traffic. And as always to avoid the officers of the law and their desire to catch people driving above the posted speed limit.

One of the pleasures of a road trip is the anonymous group driving that one can fall into – following someone with a radar detector, or just a willingness to ignore the possibility of an expensive ticket. It’s even more fun on a two-lane road like Route 46, where just because the BMW Z3 I’m following is able to get around the several slow-moving cars and trucks in front of us, I may not be able to tuck in behind him and keep up. Hence the challenge, and the enjoyment in taking it on. My friend Mark always talks about how golf is a perfect opportunity to learn a lot about someone’s personality in a very short period of time; so is driving, I think.

I make it up there safely, and without any short term painful relationships with the Highway Patrol. My friends Michael and Michael, who have known each other since they were in diapers, and have been attending the Concours nearly as long, have beat me by a day, and are set up comfortably at the bar at the Fishwife Restaurant, next to the Beachcomber Inn, where they always stay.

I join them in a martini, and we talk of cars, and their drive. Michael has a 1972 Ferrari Daytona 365 GT they drive up every year. Sweet sweet car. The best thing is to see it stomped on, which both Michael and Michael do on a regular basis. I’ve been in the passenger seat, but have not yet taken a turn behind the wheel.

There are all kinds of things to do the following day – several different events – but I’m going to try and get into the Quail. A mere $400, and called “a motorsports gathering.” It’s held at the Quail Lodge Resort & Golf Club – last year I managed a press pass, but at the time I was the executive producer of an NBC prime-time pilot that everyone expected to go to series. Top Gear, the most popular car show in the world, produced in London by the BBC, was, everyone thought, coming to NBC. The people who created the British show – Andy Wilman and host Jeremy Clarkson – had hired me to make the American translation. Our hosts were Adam Carolla, Tanner Faust, and Eric Stromer, and everyone connected with the BBC show – most importantly to me, Andy Wilman and Jeremy Clarkson – thought we had succeeded. Everyone now knows what happened to NBC – they continued their drive to prime time insignificance – and decided against picking up the show to go to series. Several people have since been fired at NBC, and Leno is often lucky to beat the top cable shows in the ratings. Which is a long-winded way of saying this year I wasn’t perceived as someone with the same level of importance as last year.

I had dutifully e-mailed and called the appropriate PR people connected to the event. And had no assurance of being able to gain admission. Nor was I prepared to spend $400 for a ticket. But even if I had been willing to, the event was sold out. There was no desire to stuff as many people as possible into the rarefied air of the Quail. No – exclusive means not everyone gets in. At breakfast Michael and Michael asked me my plans. When I told them they said “good luck with that.” But my thinking was pretty basic – there was no charge to park, and if I didn’t get in, so be it.

The parking lot at the Quail is an event unto itself. There is no massive expanse of black top, with concrete car stoppers and white stripes to delineate spaces. When one drives to the Quail, one is directed to park one’s motor vehicle on the grass, the green green grass of the golf course. There are amazing cars everyone, cars not on display, per se, but driven their by their owners as their means of conveyance to this event. A more subtle form of display, perhaps, but only subtle in this environment, where a Ferrari is not rare, where an Aston Martin DBS warrants a glance perhaps, but nothing more. This is the domain of the serious serious car aficionado, which most often goes hand in hand with serious cash.

After attempting the frontal approach with the people at the media tent – “hello, I sent an e-mail and called; in the past I did (and so forth); currently I’m developing (and so forth) for Discovery Channel. No, it’s not on yet.” Failing, I manage to get one of my friends on the phone, despite the normal signal strength problems one encounters always at the wrong time, though the right time for signal problems are rare; and he manages to find a spare media ticket for me. I have one of those moments of transformation from being on the outs to being one of those inside, the privileged few. Among the chosen. It reeks of Jane Austen somehow. Though I try to adopt an air of Hunter S. Thompson, I feel like I manage to get a bit past Nick Carraway. The champagne and oysters make a big difference.

That’s the thing about the Quail – it’s really pretty hard to beat as an event if what you like is really good food and amazingly rare and beautiful cars, in an uncluttered gathering – that is an appropriate word, it turns out – a gathering of the faithful, with the cars grouped by year, by design, by manufacturer. As I attempt to find the end of the oyster line, there are other people doing the same thing. Without ropes and stanchions it’s up to the members of polite society to figure out the form of the line themselves. A woman with a hat – which describes half the women there, reminding me of one of my favorite works of children’s literature, which actually now that I think of it, does involve cars – Go, Dog, Go! – with the female dog asking her male friend “do you like my hat?” on various pages throughout the book – looks at my wrist, and says with a playfully accusatory tone “where’s your wristband?” the signifier that I have not actually snuck in, but did indeed buy or somehow procure a ticket to the event. You think I’ve managed to sneak in, don’t you? I return the challenge, pulling my actual ticket confidently from my jacket pocket and saying “I didn’t want to bother with the wrist band.” She laughs, and her companions – one is her husband, I’m guessing, and the other couple their pals – hand me a glass of champagne as we wait in the oyster line. We make polite conversation; I ask them if they’ve seen the Bugatti with the elephant leather seats. They say they haven’t yet. We talk of cars – of course – and at the mention of Lamborghini someone in line with us asks if we would like to see his Lamborghini. By now we’ve made our way to the head of the oyster line, where 6 people stand behind ice and oyster laden tables, a veritable Shangri-la of bivalves, and I’m more focused on enjoying the incredible taste and texture of amazing oysters, being shucked as I slowly make my way from one shucker to another, eating eating eating with an occasional sip of champagne the ocean coming to life on my tongue as the oyster’s life is ended; from the sea we came and to the sea I return with every precious experience, the chilled salt water the slippery deliciousness – did I use that word already – it’s hard to describe to a non-oyster lover the crystallization of the sensory experience of a perfect oyster, accompanied by a worthwhile champagne or super premium super chilled vodka. Ah but there it is, the end of the line, the last of the shuckers, and I pause an extra moment, down the last of the champagne, and avail myself of one last oyster. Slowly I ease away from the table by nothing less than sheer force of will, fighting with myself to find some semblance of decorum when confronted with such a rare and powerful opportunity. I emerge from my food fugue, and find my fellow oyster eaters nearby. Come look at my Lamborghini says one of them. I follow them all, the two couples, the Lambo owner, and his son.


Lambo

The Lamborghini is indeed beautiful, immaculate, and very cool. We’re all invited to sit in it, and I do. It provokes the era in which it was made – the mid 60’s – all Italian clean elegant modern design. A worthy object, this car, and probably fun to drive, though I imagine it drives like the past as well. Stiff and unforgiving and not how one imagines it would be. But fun to think about. I ask the owner’s son if he gets to drive it. Absolutely, he assures me, which is a great answer. They take it out most weekends, he says. Which is better than most rare objects – less than 200 were made – put to use, and not just turned into a full-sized expensive Matchbox or Hot Wheel.

We all wandered off separately. I went back to the elephant car. Even though I know things were different in 1930 – there were more elephants, the world seemed bigger, Histoire de Babar was to be published in 1931 for the first time – it still seemed somehow wrong to have the hide of an elephant adorn the inside of a car. Even though it took fewer elephants than cows to provide the leather, it was a bit unusual to see the interior and think about the elephant that was wearing the seat I saw in front of me.


ol' No. 18, a '32 Studebaker

More eating, more drinking, more strolling around and soaking in the sense of luxurious living. Old Ferraris are rare enough, but the dark blue Ferrari has its very own special lineage. I wonder who Prince Bernhard is, thinking maybe I’ll have to look him up on the internet some time. Turns out he was from Holland, and visited the Ferrari factory in Italy several times as the car was being made. He sold it in 1961. I wonder if he missed it.

A one-off MGA built in 1960 looked very Buck Rogers. Especially with the wooden seats.

I was in no hurry to leave, but I also didn’t want to be the last one there. So déclassé. Besides, they took down the oyster bar, and closed up the champagne. There was really no point in hanging around. Time to get out with the rest of the hoi polloi.

The next day was the Historics – the name by which most people call the Historic Races at Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca – when old cars are taken out of the showroom, the garage, the museum and actually taken out on the track and run around the course. Not just oversized, overpriced Hot Wheels, but actual cars that run, going wheel to wheel, on the famous track where legends have been born, records set, and lives lost. It takes some balls to put a million dollar rarity on the track and subject it to the vagaries of actual use as opposed to reserving it for idolatry.

Each year the event honors and features a particular car manufacturer. This year it was Porsche, and America’s most famous Porsche collector, Jerry Seinfeld, was there with a car. Rumor had it he was going to get behind the wheel of one of his cars and take a turn or two on the track.

There were a few people looking at a Porsche with some significant history in mid-restoration. The signage that explained which Porsche it was – and sure enough there was Jerry, with a few squires in attendance. He wasn’t being mobbed, but it was fun to see people walk by, and every now and then stop in recognition, and think to themselves – do I really want to go over and bug him? Most walked on.

The Seinfeld Porsche was right next to an actual movie star Porsche, the one that Steve McQueen drove in the movie “Le Mans,” the number 20 Gulf Porsche, with the classic baby blue with orange color scheme. These cars were parked near the entrance to the track, where race cars were driven from their paddocks out into the pits, prior to taking their turns in class-by-class races. A small group of people hung around, waiting for certain favorite cars to make their way through the crowds. It was one of those scenarios ripe with small drama, from the track safety people, to the fans, to the casual car tag-alongs, there to please their spouse, loved one, or friend, and the actual drivers, mechanics, and owners themselves. Robert Duvall can extol the smell of napalm in the morning, but to these people nothing beats race fuel and exhaust any time of the day or night.

One of the fun things about attending the Historics is to stumble across the odd, the rare, the unusual and actually see these often unique one-of-a-kind vehicles opened up on a race track. This year I was fortunate enough to see the “Battlebird” in action for the first time out on the track. Built in 1957 by Ford, the special edition Thunderbird was one of two built for the Daytona Speed Week competition. Chris, the driver, gave me some details from the “Battlebird’s” past. Ford was after a new record in the “flying mile” on the hard-pack sand of Daytona Beach, a popular location for land speed record attempts in the old days, when those sorts of records were a regular staple of the popular media, and the cars and drivers enjoyed the limelight as legitimate sports celebrities.


The '57 Ford "Battlebird."

In 1957 the “Battlebird” made 1 pass and recorded at time over 200 miles an hour, pretty sweet for the day. But the time would only stand as official if a second pass above 200 miles an hour was recorded. Mechanical problems prevented a successful second run. The second of the two “Battlebirds” built for the effort is in the record books with two runs above 160 miles an hour. No one knows where the second “Battlebird” ended up.

There was a happy group sitting in the shade in their paddock area, behind a beautiful blue 1932 Studebaker, an Indy car, #18 Studebaker Special. While holding on to his tuna fish sandwich, the owner told me how the car was a true barn find, and how much fun it was to run the boat tailed, flat 8 around the track. He was fine with people sitting in the one seat and posing for pictures, and it was interesting to see how far race cars have come in 77 years.

I ended up wandering through the booth area with books, shirts, posters, and other race and automotive related items for sale on my way to an area next to the field where a new car was on display. Something that may be historic, and one day show up on the track, but for now is for show and tell - plug-in electrics being developed for market. An interesting combination of gasoline and electricity, the supercar styled hybrids can be recharged by normal 110 volt house plugs, but also feature a small on-board engine that runs on gasoline. The gasoline engine, unlike the Prius-type hybrid, does not work in conjunction with the electric engine. Rather, it’s designed only to recharge the on-board batteries that power the electric motors that make the car move. CEO and designer Fisker stood in front of his two door roadster and four door sedan, the first vehicle, named Karma, and posed in true captain of industry/superhero fashion. If his Fisker Automotive succeeds, he’ll be both.

Time for a few races, more wandering amidst the rows and rows of amazing cars, and off I went for the day. At a certain point it’s impossible to absorb any more.

And then it’s Sunday. The main event – the anchor of the nearly week-long immersion into the world of gears, wheels, deals, and big dollar cars – the Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance, the 59th Annual event, with cars from around the world, lined up on the 18th fairway of the golf course by the water’s edge, separated by category, competing for various awards and trophies.

Hard to miss was the 1921 Paige – bright yellow, with a smiling woman in period costume holding an umbrella. I asked her if she donned her get up to go galavanting about in the car, which made me think of a crayon box; maybe it was the yellow and the green grass, the object from the past. No she told me. Once you drive it, you can’t show it. These cars adorning the pristine grass were specimens, museum pieces, rare examples of design, engineering, manufacturing; a display of passion and obsession for preservation and perfection. They’ve ceased to be cars in the actual specific sense, and have ascended to Mt. Olympus as car-like objects of reverence, representative of their time and place of origin, but no longer mere mortal cars to be used for something as mundane as driving them.

A Ferrari from 1957

My favorite of all the cars on the lawn was the 1937 Alfa Romeo 6C 2300B Pescara Berlinetta. The entire family was standing around enjoying themselves, and thrilled to be there from Europe with the car. The wife told me they were told it would take 3 years to restore, and it took 6. Just like construction – double the time estimate. From the fin on the back, to the rear wheel covers, the inset door handles, the circles on the engine covers – the integration of all the design details into a comprehensive and alluring whole strike one as so cohesive, so elegant and ideal. Looking at it made me smile, and this feeling of pleasure was enhanced by how happy the owner and his family were, standing around and soaking in the scene. They had somehow incorporated the car and their experience into their family dynamic – it had become a member of the family.


would you believe...an early Alfa?

Two Chryslers from 1941 made a matched set of style and innovation – the Thunderbolt, designed by Alex Tremulis and the Newport, designed by Ralph Roberts and Alex Tremulis. Some reports say five of each were built. The Newport was chosen as the pace car for the Indianapolis 500. Both cars made me think of the design palate of the film Roger Rabbit. The fanciful dual cowl, the voluptuous curves, the streamlined nature of them both leave one feeling drenched in nostalgia. They were built in 90 days, an almost impossible feat. And the Thunderbolt took two years to restore to its original condition. Which proves the maxim that it’s always more difficult and time consuming to fix something than to build it in the first place.

Nine years later and curves were still in – at least in Italy. The 1949 Fiat Topolino 750cc Zagato drew an appreciative onlooker. The Topolino name was reportedly based on affection for Mickey Mouse, “topolino” meaning little mouse in Italian.

1911 Oldsmobile Limited. Interesting to see how far things changed in 30 years, going back to the Thunderbolt and the Newport. From a hulking behometh more closely resembling farm equipment than the elegant lines of what was to come, its ability to endure the decades is impressive. The horn resembling a tuba, the wooden-spoked wheels borrowed from an actual horse-drawn wagon. Transportation in its purest, utilitarian form.

The oddest vehicles, in some ways, were the 3-wheeled Morgans. A white 1947, and a black 1937. Ten years on and the design relatively the same – the spare tire conveniently attached to the back end of the vehicle. 3 wheeled vehicles being less expensive to produce, and due to reduced weight and smaller engines, less expensive to operate. All in the pre-Hummer days of course. One would not want to meet up with a 4-wheeled behemoth in their sprightly little 3-wheeler.

And there are more. And still more. Great hats, bow ties, people dressed up and turned out for the occasion. Some remodeled and restored themselves, the running joke in the car world – customizers of cars have custom wives as well. At a certain point there’s a satiation factor that sets in, and I retreat from the field to the Mercedes Benz suites, thoughtfully placed in the prime location with access to the viewing and judging area, as each car will drive the short distance from its viewing location past the throngs and judges, to be considered for one of the awards and prizes. By then, I’m long gone. Another year marveling at motor cars, their fans, owners, and keepers.

Monday, December 7, 2009

A Borscht-Belt Bartolo

Praticò, DiDonoto et al. light up LA Opera's Barber of Seville

Bruno Praticò and Joyce DiDonato

By Donna Perlmutter

Just imagine: Zero Mostel has come back to life and he’s impersonating Dr. Bartolo, that is, the semi-lecherous old stick of a guardian in Rossini’s confection of an opera buffa, Il Barbiere di Siviglia.

But wait. This Bartolo is also a patter meister extraordinaire. In his bass-baritone voice he can cleanly articulate/sing more syllables faster and more cleanly than the long-gone tobacco auctioneer of ancient, cigarette-ad days. And his timing? Better than Jack Benny’s. In the only English line spoken at the Music Center Pavilion, courtesy of Los Angeles Opera, Bruno Praticò rolls his rotund self downstage, faces the audience as he listens to an importuning knock on the door, and in a dead-pan, without moving a muscle, says loudly, “Who Ees Dare.”

I can’t do justice to the hilarity of that moment, or any of the other like moments that the master showcases, guided here by director Javier Ulacia. But even for those who don’t care for comic opera there’s much to revel in besides Pratico, who has performed this choice role at most of the elite international houses.

Others in the star-studded cast include the Rosina of Joyce DiDonato (left), the American mezzo (yes, a genuine coloratura mezzo, as Rossini ordered, not a canary soprano). She’s the trouper – remember? – who hobbled around on a crutch just after really breaking her leg mid-performance to “go on with the show” at Covent Garden; and, yes, she finished that run in a wheel chair!

Well, this Rosina not only lit up the house with her luscious voice and purling, nuanced roulades but she played just as nimbly as a girl who could outsmart her captor yet keep her innocence, too. What’s more, there was the Almaviva of Juan Diego Flórez – current king of the high C’s – and no slouch himself in the physical action department, although his voice sounds a tad small at the Pavilion and wiry at times. Most tenors sing sweetly, ardently and amiably but not with enough technique to seal the last act with Cessa di piu resistere, the killer aria they usually omit. Flórez does it. And with great vocal flourish.


DiDonato and Juan Diego Flórez

As the title character, Nathan Gunn made a cheery cohort, if not a self-important enough Figaro and sang reasonably well. But the walrus-like Andrea Silvestrelli was a big, bluff, bellowing basso of a Basilio, comic without even trying.

The point here, as in most operas of the genre, is deception – Bartolo being the ridiculous old grump of a bad man everyone wants to deceive, in order for Rosina and Almaviva to betroth. The production, originated by Emilio Sagi, who, together with his team from Madrid’s Teatro Real that gave LA Opera its characterful 2005 Carmen, also put its stylish stamp here. Gone, thank god, are all those awful buffo clichés that have Figaro costumed as a red and white barber pole, for instance.

Instead, as the overture plays – deftly but almost facelessly under Michele Mariotti – we see, off in the distance, little men in black suits emerging from the floor boards to scurry about and push in place all the movable panels of Llorenc Corbella’s set. With a huge gray sky looming over the scene, its ingenious stagecraft looks like something from a Fellini movie and its musical phrasing is unerring.

So too were Renata Schussheim’s costumes, a sophisticated fashion display with smart hats, all in black-and-white prints, stripes, polka dots that identified the various Sevillian street types, even the occasional flamenco couple (of course, everything turned colorful for the happy ending). Nuria Castejon’s choreography, especially the scene with Rosina and Almaviva singing their duet while maneuvering on, around and under a table, even sitting up back to back on the table was a marvel of musicality. Of course it required talent of this proportion to even imagine such action.

Happily, there is no prompter’s box for these performances. It’s a dream show – all of it.

Friday, November 27, 2009

A Tamerlano for the Tenorissimo


Tamerlano, Opera in three acts (1724-31)
Music by George Frideric Handel
Text by Nicola Francesco Haym (from earlier operas)

Saturday, November 21, 2009 – 7:30 pm, LA Opera
Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, Los Angeles Music Center

Conductor, William Lacey
Director, Chas Rader-Shieber
Scenery and Costumes, David Zinn
Lighting, Christopher Akerlind
Stage Manager, Lyla Forlani

Tamerlano, Bejun Mehta, countertenor
Bajazet, Plácido Domingo, tenor
Asteria, Sarah Coburn, soprano
Andronico, Patricia Bardon, mezzo-soprano
Irene, Jennifer Holloway, mezzo-soprano
Leone, Ryan McKinny, bass-baritone

Review by Rodney Punt

The Tamerlano of history (aka “Timor the Lame”) was a 14th Century Mongol strongman to be reckoned with, his capital the legendary Samarkand. The last great nomadic leader, he was also an intellect and cultivator of the arts, bigger than life and ripe for stage treatment. Authors and composers duly complied, making much of his exploits for centuries after his whirlwind reign.

George Frideric Handel wrote his version of Tamerlano in a characteristic spurt of energy in just 24 days during July of 1724. One of a trio of his greatest operas written in succession, it comes after Giulio Cesare in Egitto (1724, produced by LA Opera in 2001), and before Rodelinda (1725).

The most tragic of Handel’s stage works, Tamerlano's interior drama is sustained through dramatic recitative and short arioso. Musical numbers are prevailingly in the minor key. The orchestra’s woodwinds, with subdued string writing including two theorbos in the bass register, enforce somber coloration. (There isn’t a brass instrument to be found.) The reason for LA Opera’s mounting it now may, however, relate more to a fortunate historic convergence of opera politics and artistic second thoughts.

Handel had engaged the popular Italian Francesco Borosini for the role of Bajazet. The first superstar tenor in history (but certainly not the last), he brought with him another operatic setting of the same story that placed more importance on his own character. Handel bowed to Borosini's clout and incorporated dramatic elements of that setting into his own version, composing opera’s first leading tenor role, and, to the tenor's delight and those that followed him, a superlative death scene.

The Bajazet role sits comfortably in the range of the indefatigable Plácido Domingo. As a result, Tamerlano was revived, from 2008, as a star vehicle for the tenor-impresario, and shared between his two opera companies in Los Angeles and Washington D.C. The LA Opera incarnation was premiered last Saturday evening at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, in a minimalist production only sporadically inspired in design and direction, but well performed by a cast of six singers and Baroque orchestra under the direction of William Lacey.


The opera’s plot is a tangle of alienated affections, frustrated intentions, and mistaken motives. Tamerlano (Bejun Mehta) a haughty, cruel monarch has conquered and imprisoned Bajazet (Plácido Domingo), and is bent on winning the affections of his daughter, Asteria (Sarah Coburn) who is herself in love with Andronico, (Patricia Bardon, in a trouser role). Andronico, allied with Tamerlano, is in love with Asteria, but unaware of this Tamerlano attempts to bribe him for his help in winning Asteria for himself. Irene (Jennifer Holloway) wants to convince Tamerlano to love her. Leone (Ryan McKinny), seemingly a friend to all, intervenes. Things spin seriously out of control in various duels of wits and wills, especially between Tamerlano, who holds all the cards, and Bajazet, defeated, depressed, and worried about the fate of his much sought-after daughter.

Within its operatic conventions of coercive power pursuing a love interest, the opera has remarkable psychological truth. Hell-bent on gaining the affection of Asteria, emperor Tamerlano is held in check by a desire that his ardent love be returned of Asteria’s own free will. The mounting tension is relieved only with the death of the intransigent Bajazet, and Tamerlano’s subsequent realization of Irene’s true love for him, which in turn leads to the forgiveness of his remaining rivals and enemies. This Enlightenment era denouement was to anticipate that of Mozart’s frothy Abduction from the Seraglio by over half a century.

The LA Opera production is not quite up to the opera’s dramatic potential, however. Its stark, unimaginative set resembles a 20th Century fascistic bunker, a hackneyed concept by now. The expressionistic lighting alternates bright glare with deep shadows, but only sporadically to valid psychological effect. The vision is bleak. Later on a metallic field riser, two plain chairs, and a red curtain backdrop serve as a bare-bones throne for conquering greatness. The look overall is crisp, but also cheaply expedient.

Some of the staging is problematic. A dozen bully-boy military police stand around in clichéd configurations, overhearing secrets they should not hear, having only passing reaction to them, and finally not being present at the critical moment in Act III when Tamerlano orders them to move against his enemies. They initially suggest Mussolini-like thugs, but end up looking like the impotent Russian soldiers I saw standing around and lost in Berlin after the Wall was torn down, with no remaining mission to perform, but no housing to return to in the Motherland.

The victorious Tartars and allied Greeks, in modern black suit and dress, blend into the bland setting. By contrast, the defeated Bajazet wears a flowing Turkish gown that glimmers of red and gold satin, with cape to match, his daughter Asteria similarly if less spectacularly attired. The dress code suggests gray and black militarism snuffing out a colorful and humanistic old order, but it may also have something to do with a star tenor’s desire for audience attention.

The implacable Bajazet is already out of step with the other characters on stage. His role should be sympathetic. But modern psychology might also find his character a neurotic depressive, projecting the negativity of a defeated man on all those around him, most notably on his daughter. The production does nothing to soften this perception. His constant state of anger has him stomping off to the same stage-left door in each act, bestowing unintentional tedium to an already intransigent character. Our initial sympathies flag by the end of the third act, and his much threatened death comes as something of a relief at his final gasps.

There are amusing elements. With a countertenor singing the alpha-male role of Tamerlano, his rival Andronico a trouser role, and stage action emphasizing a sexless disguise for Irene, there was as much gender-ambiguity on the Chandler’s stage as a Halloween on Hollywood Boulevard. A distinguished gentleman sitting to the left of me couldn’t make heads or tails of who was supposed to be in love with whom. Imagine his confusion had he attended an authentic Baroque performance with all three roles sung by the original castrati. Fellini, where art thou?

In his 126th operatic role, Plácido Domingo seems destined to be, if not the world’s most adored tenor, certainly its most accomplished. He has sung in only one other Baroque opera in a long career, but Bajazet is a role uniquely appropriate for him. Domingo’s recent outing as a dramatic baritone in the title role of Simon Boccanegra should by all rights have left his 68-year-old vocal chords hardened and unready for Baroque coloratura. Understandably lacking some of the vocal dexterity of his colleagues, Domingo was, however, able to summon a plangent, brightened version of his tenor voice with enough agility to negotiate the demands of a role that emphasizes dramatic elements over pyrotechnics. Even as his energies dipped toward the end of the victory lap that the role of Bajazet represents for him, Domingo was up to the challenge, investing his performance with a young man’s intensity and commitment.

Domingo and company have assembled a first class set of singing actors as his foils, capable youngsters still approaching their career highs, none of whom were even born when he launched his professional career over forty years ago.

I have admired Bejun Mehta from his LA Opera performance in Giulio Cesare several seasons ago, where his dramatic countertenor eclipsed even the more famous David Daniels in the same opera. Here, in the title role, he reigns supreme in flourishing coloratura passages. Lithe and limber in dark suit and bald pate, he has the look and manner of Yul Brynner’s King of Siam, moving menacingly on little cat feet. He cold-heartedly rips pages from Bajazet’s books and then carefully cleans his fingers with a 15th Century equivalent of a Handi Wipe. His sadomasochistic behavior toward Asteria lends potency to his later fearsome revenge aria, but also makes his final relenting toward her something of a large leap in dramatic credibility.

Sarah Coburn’s Asteria was winning, a pure lyric soprano of lighter weight than the others, but flexible and expressive. Her scenes with Domingo rang emotionally true and provided some of the evenings most tender moments. Likewise, Patricia Bardon’s Andronico was intensely focused, dramatically and vocally, with a near show-stopper aria at the end of Act II, though her role resembles that of the powerless Ottavio in Don Giovanni.

Jennifer Holloway’s Irene was also vocally accomplished, her character a statuesque career girl in business suit, but the use of glasses as her full disguise raised some audience eyebrows. Leone's Ryan McKinny made the most of his single aria, and his staging was the one brilliant touch in an otherwise merely efficient movement of the cast. While originally conceived by Handel and Haym as a loyal supporter of the court, in this production he secretly pines for Tamerlano's Irene, and as an ambitious royal wannabe writhes around the empty throne.

LA Opera has had a good track record with Baroque opera, the aforementioned Giulio Cesare a solid success and its production of Monteverdi’s Incoronazione di Poppea a few seasons ago an outstanding one. While this production does not live up to those standards either scenically or dramatically, it is every bit their equal vocally.

Might there be a Rodelinda, that third great Handel opera, in the offing for a future season?

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Achilles and Agit-Prop

DV8 Physical Theater at Royce Hall


by Donna Perlmutter

Holey Moley! Whatever could have happened to Londoner Lloyd Newson’s DV8 Physical Theatre -- the unique company that came to UCLA for the first time a dozen years ago with penetrating narratives devoid of a single spoken word? Yes, you read right. Its thoroughly amazing performances told whole, verbally-silent stories through settings, sit-drams and social characterizations.

Well, the DV8ers just returned to campus (Royce Hall, this time) and managed to break every rule it had so brilliantly established at its American debut. (More on that later.)

Back in 1997 Newson, a sober counterpart to his countryman satirist Matthew Bourne (of “Swan Lake” fame), along with a band of dancing actors, captured a machismo society’s ethos and, especially, the kind of relationships it breeds – those with fetishes and foibles, insecurities and bravado, false stances and fierce defenses, all in a context of raging neo-realism. A world of “guy-ism.”

Angry young men polished their bruises and competed as anti-heroes of one sort or another: stud, provocateur, pop singer, chug-a-lug champion, suavely swaggering pro. All of them were blokes with entry-level jobs bonding in aggressively physical encounters that often turned surprisingly affectionate. The caption to their acrobatic, body-linking antics, in the piece titled “Enter Achilles,” might be Pina Bausch meets Pilobolus.

But Newson struck all that down in his latest opus, “To Be Straight With You.” This time he veered into victim art: the degradation, cruelty and even death that gays suffer across the world (depicted in cleverly graphed statistical visuals). So not only does he ghetto-ize and narrow his frame of reference, he relies almost exclusively on the spoken word. Sad to say, he’s substituted agit-prop or a sociologist’s survey, for the genuine theatrical article.

What the collective audience-ear gets is soliloquy, seminar and sermon -- recited in barely intelligible Afro-Caribbean English by the actual dancing denizens of poor, immigrant neighborhoods. Some of them actually speak live while performing their gestural calisthenics and virtuosic moves – others resort to pre-recorded monologues. One, an Indian who cleverly combines a kind of Kathak with disco moves, is also a master at jumping rope, which he does over a vast dynamic range of speed, grace and nuance.

True, Newson’s emphasis rests with the fundamentalist Muslim world’s taboo against anything but prescribed heterosexuality – he even harpoons a hypocritical gay imam for enjoying a habitat with wife and children, while keeping his bathhouse harem on the side. And, not to leave out western religion, he documents how extreme Christians bear more in common with Muslim intolerance than do Jews, who, he says, boast a liberal posture.

But for American audiences, who now are on the verge of accepting gay marriage, there is an archaic feel to all this primitivism. How I wish that Newson, with all his creativity and powers of observation, could stay looking at the bigger picture society offers him.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Sig-Alert

LA Opera announced yesterday that Laura Karpman's The 110 Project will be performed as works-in-progress at Saturday, Nov. 21, at Pasadena's Pacific Asia Museum and the next day, Sunday, Nov. 22, at California African American Museum. Time is 1 p.m. for both performances, which is free with museum admission.

The work features stories drawn from communities adjacent to the 110 Freeway.

Saturday, October 31, 2009

The Cancer Dance

This alternatively hopeful and despairing and hopeful and agonizing and ultimately peaceful routine on So You Think You Can Dance, which has come to be known as "The Cancer Dance," rendered some otherwise talkative judges speechless last summer:



The poetry of the routine and the fact that it was on network television has caused some involved with dance have called this performance too emotionally manipulative. I disagree. The lift @ 0.49 is astonishing. The protestation @ 1:13 is all physicality. The quiet way the piece ends, with a slow, diminished but still elegant turn into a centering, peaceful lift, is a perfect hushed climax.

The ballerina is Melissa Sandvig, who was classically trained and who has danced locally for LA Opera and Long Beach Ballet. The man is Ade Obayomi, whose original idiom is contemporary dance. The choreographer was Tice Diorio. The sole prop is a scarf.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Gustavo con gusto

LA and its Philharmonic enter affair with Dudamel


by Donna Perlmutter


He used to be the starriest young arrival in the international conductor sweepstakes. That was then. Four years ago – before clinching the win.

But after Gustavo Dudamel launched his first season as podium chief of the Los Angeles Philharmonic -- with18,000 revelers at Hollywood Bowl and then at Disney Hall, which was sold to the walls and thronged with celebrities -- the Venezuelan Wunderkind is on world-watch, thanks to the information superhighway and media pitched to a 24/7 news cycle. And, oh, yes, let us not forget his extraordinary gifts and his charisma, duly captured by the electronic billboards and posters all over town.

Meanwhile, it would be good to remember that Dudamel, the product of an honest-to-god socialist democracy, knows music’s inherent value of community and collaboration. Why, he’s even sat in as an ad hoc string quartet’s second violin for an evening of chamber music with the orchestra players – how’s that for humility and egalitarianism?

All we had to do at Disney was observe his conduct at curtain-call time. No solo bows. Not even a tiny one. Instead he bounded off the podium and rushed to acknowledge his musicians, threading his way through the music stands, rousing soloist by soloist, section by section, to stand for their own deserved ovations. Only together with them, not as a separate being, would he beam back at the audience.

The music-making itself justified the uproarious response it got. First came a world premiere, John Adams’ City Noir, just what its title indicates: an extrapolation of scores written for Hollywood’s 40s and 50s film-noir genre – vaguely menacing, lonely sounding episodes of melancholy that swirl with smoldering languor. The work is a kind of Blues in the Night alternating with eerie, shimmering parts, intricate collisions of winds and strings, accented with Adams’ signature: warmly bouncy, minimalist flirtations.

Dudamel took the piece vigorously in hand and the players more than obliged.

But it was the Mahler First that our young maestro seized on, communicating every scintilla of its pastoral joy, lugubrious shtetl memory, piquant nostalgia and sky-touching exhilaration – which is not to say that he slighted delicacy or subtlety.

It’s all there. And it’s there because he’s in constant contact with the musicians. As though to say, “I’m on the ride of my life and I’m taking you with me. We’re on this ride together.”

What we heard in the Mahler, as well as in his previous outings here, was the Dudamel stop-and-consider moments. As if to underline a word by spelling it aloud he would elongate a passage, stretch it out as though teaching it – both to the players and the audience. And then, in its repeat, breathlessly speed it up as though to say, “Yes, now we know it intimately. Here is its ultimate impact.”

That’s one thing L.A. audiences already know about Dudamel and the Phil: they make fabulously full-blown, gorgeously high-colored music together.

It’s of a different order than what the orchestra yielded with Esa-Pekka Salonen, who, over his 17 years as music director, shaped and refined the band’s performance to a glistening shine. In fact, for all the Finnish conductor’s masterly ways with big, complex scores running multiple rhythms simultaneously, he often managed standard repertory – Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms – as would a sonic engineer, moving things carefully and with perfect balance but staying largely on the surface.

Dudamel takes the opposite tack – the highs are dizzying, the lows rumble – but his marvelous sense of abandon and vitality is undergirded by utter control. That’s what’s so amazing: the combination. And no better example could be heard last season than in Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony.

It reflects his youth, 28, not just his huge talent. It’s all sunshine, full of character. Even the thunderstorm is a Technicolor close-up. And he dances, involuntarily, it seems: His whole body becomes the music, or at least the medium through which it passes. Nothing is designed here. It’s a case of spontaneity, of riding in the now.

Of course there’s no forgetting Carlo Maria Giulini’s very different way with the Pastoral. The late old-world Italian maestro who led the Phil for a few years in the 80s found, in the Sixth Symphony, a hushed, tensile lyricism – sustaining the slow movement as a single breath. But for all the brilliance of Salonen’s account of the Beethoven Fourth, so full of big architectural sites and needing only to be rocked to a rhythmic fury (which he did), his Pastoral was just a sleepy glide through the park, a place to beat time. Yes, that awful way station for too many conductors who turn into a human metronome.

And while we’re comparing Salonen and Dudamel – maybe the same way the late linguist Bill Safire compared the outgoing Reagan and the incoming Bush 1: the former liked jelly beans, the latter (supposedly) preferred pork rinds, an identifying process called the semiotics of dissimilarity – we might as well pay attention to their opposing physical and sartorial style.

Salonen had become, in these last years of his tenure, surely the hippest baton-wielder. He now wears slim, drapey, long black jackets over black silky collar-less shirts. He moves into action for big climactic moments like a slithery kinetic module. A marvel to watch, by itself, but also, importantly, an expression of the music’s underlying rhythmic convulsions.

Dudamel (who’s being affectionately called “The Dude”) has not lived in the world of fashionistas. His podium attire harks back to the old tradition -- white tie, white ruffled shirt with cumberbund and tails. But one thing he never is: a time beater. He leaps into the music, across the music stands, in an entirely unself-conscious way that still retains a certain body togetherness.

In fact, the orchestra members seem to be in love. They actually watch him, they lock eyes with him – and that’s something seldom seen; more often players follow in their scores and hardly look at the guy up there waving his arms. Really, it’s like the beginning stage of an affair, when every glance is meaningful, every caress observed. And we heard that last season in Berlioz’s Symphonie Fantastique, where they and their inamorata lingered too long, too lovingly over many phrases, breaking apart the continuity.

The love affair will deepen, no doubt, and move onto more familiar ground. This is just the beginning. But what a beginning.